Program Checklist for the Inquiry Brief
Please submit this checklist with each draft during formative evaluation. After the Brief has been declared auditable, submit a final version of this checklist with the final version of the Brief. Please remember to sign and date the checklist each time you submit it.
|
Requirement for the Brief |
Where in the Brief? |
|
1. We identify the author(s) of the document. |
|
|
2. We provide evidence that faculty approved the document. |
|
|
3. We give an account of the history of the program and its place within the institution. |
|
|
4. We provide demographics of program faculty and students, broken out by year, by “bundled” programs, and other factors. |
|
|
5. We state our claims explicitly. |
|
|
6. We address all components of QPI (1.1-1.3) |
|
|
We address all subcomponents of QPI: |
|
|
Claims are consistent with other program documents. |
Yes. Woven throughout the document. |
|
7. In the rationale, we link our assessments with |
|
|
8. We describe the overall design of our assessments, including sampling, controls (if applicable), goodness of fit. |
|
|
9. We provide at least two measures for each claim. |
|
|
10. Every measure includes reliability and validity information. |
|
|
11. Our findings are related to every claim, and we offer a conclusion for each claim, explaining how our evidence supports the claim. |
Findings= Results Conclusion= Discussion |
|
12. We describe how we have recently used evidence in making program decisions, improvements, and changes. |
Appendix G |
|
13. We provide a plan for making decisions concerning program improvement based on evidence. |
Appendix G |
|
14. We meet the conditions of the internal audit: a model of the QCS that addresses 4.1-4.7; and a report approved by faculty. |
|
|
15. Our QCS includes a plan for researching links between student learning and 4.1-4.7. |
|
|
16. We provide an appendix that describes faculty qualifications. |
|
|
17. We provide an appendix that describes our program requirements. |
|
|
18. We make a case for institutional commitment to the program. |
|
|
19. We make a case for sufficient capacity to offer a quality program (4.1-4.7). |
|
|
20. We list all evidence (related to accreditation) available to the program. |